8 Comments
User's avatar
Maria Edlenborg Mortensen's avatar

Really thoughtful piece.

The point that stood out to me is the shift from asking which model is smartest to asking which architecture is safest. In healthcare especially, capability without governance quickly becomes a liability.

I’ve been exploring a related question while building a beta framework around decision systems and ethical tension in complex environments (ETOS / IDK). Your argument that the real solution is architectural resonates strongly with that line of thinking.

Suny Choudhary's avatar

I’m glad you found it useful!

Room 13 by Drsika's avatar

I love the TLDR at the starting! Thank you for bringing awareness to this, it’s much needed especially given the frequency of use

Suny Choudhary's avatar

I’m glad you found it informational!

Babette Gil's avatar

This isn’t medically related but it’s almost audible that the legal division is “in the next room” when I use ChatGPT.

As an interactive journal and thinking partner, somehow, it seems like a lawyer is tagging along—without invitation.

I don’t feel safe with my thoughts with chatGPT. Imagine if it were my medical info.

Suny Choudhary's avatar

That’s completely valid, and to be honest, I’ve heard many people have the same issue. It’s quite concerning too.

Babette Gil's avatar

oh, good, I thought it was just me. I wrote a chapter about that in my book. Tracking the tonal shifts of ChatGPT over the past few months. It’s almost like a relationship. At first, sweet, tentative, funny. Then the cooling and gaslighting. Then the break up.

Ron healer and free thinker's avatar

Did you know in a frequency of 540 there's no disease existing in the body.

Disease starts as a thought and if you feed the thoughts with negative we get sick, because the body is incoherent